On the eve of the 21st December 2012, you hold the key

This video is two-hours and thirty minutes long and contains quantam physics scientific evidence.   It is truly worth your effort to watch if you are one of those thinking the world has gone to hell or your life sucks.  Click here for FREE YOUTUBE DOWNLOADER (downloads any video format apparently), if you would like to keep a copy and spread the news.



Vaccines – If you are a parent, want to be a parent, grandparent or care-giver TAKE NOTE!

I am sure some think I go on and on about killer medicines, killer foods etcettera, however these are REAL issues.  It’s not a “new age” thing.  It’s not a “tree-hugger” thing.  It’s certainly not so that I gain popularity!

This is about SHARING VITAL INFORMATION that will HELP others!  So even though I am no saint (thank goodness), I am all about helping where I can and one hopes that this is your way of thinking too!  It should be, we all share this planet – lets make it a good experience!

That being said, I urge you to also do your own research in addition to mine.  Get lots of information, and form your OWN OPINION.  Don’t be led like a sheep into a myriad of half-truths and disinformation.  Rather be that person that stands out, thinking independently and forming your own ideas using whatever information may be available and your brain combined.

Why I hate Vaccines


After my second child was born, I was arm-wrestled into having him vaccined before he would be accepted into a pre-school at a few months old.  This was their condition and he would only be accepted if he had the relevant vaccine stamps and signatures from clinics/doctors.  So being trusting of the procedure I took my child for his vaccines.  A day later he had the fever reaction most babies have to vaccines.   In later years, despite measles vaccine he got measles.  Despite the mumps vaccine he got mumps.  I was instructed by his school that he had to go for a booster shot before he could start grade one, which I did (getting the relevant stamp on the card to present to the school).

Later I was told my son had ADHD and had to take medications for it, which he did until he became a zombie of his former self and a willowy skinny boy!  I stopped his medication and did not tell the school – they didn’t notice and his performance WAS THE SAME!  My elder son is also dyslexic.

Recently (beginning of this year), I looked into behavioural disorders like ADHD, ADD, Dyslexia and Autism in a bid to understand why these disorders exist.  I became saddened by the information that came to the surface.  Law suits have been filed against pharmaceutical companies and governments in different countries with proof that medication was the culprit for these and many other disorders (one being depression and also a novella of physical defects and dangerous side-effects, some of which have only been discovered recently).  There began my campaign to share information about this.

Here is just a small article regarding vaccines.

Source: (click on title)


Picture Source: http://www.davidicke.com



30 Year Cover-Up of Vaccine Dangers Exposed in UK Government Transcripts

By Apollo



                        An extraordinary paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.

A Freedom of Information Act filing by a doctor in the UK, has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have

1. Known the vaccines don’t work
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies

Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US, and many other countries.

No pharmaceutical drug is devoid of risks from adverse reactions and vaccines are no exception. According to the world’s leading drug regulatory authority, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), vaccines represent a special category of drugs in that they are generally given to healthy individuals and often to prevent a disease to which an individual may never be exposed. This, according to the FDA, places extra emphasis on vaccine safety.

Universally, regulatory authorities are responsible for ensuring that new vaccines go through proper scientific evaluation before they are approved. An equal responsibility rests on the medical profession to promote vaccinations but only with those vaccines whose safety and efficacy has been demonstrated to be statistically significant. Furthermore, vaccination is a medical intervention and as such, it should be carried out with the full consent of those who are being subjected to it. This necessitates an objective disclosure of the known or foreseeable risks and benefits and, where applicable, a description of alternative courses of treatment. In cases where children and infants are involved, full consent
with regards to vaccination should be given by the parents.

Deliberately concealing information from the parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could thus be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.

As a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics (i.e., Helsinki Declaration and the International Code of Medical Ethics) but also, their own Code of Practice.

This is what everyone has always known but could never prove before now. Pass this information on to others so they can see what goes on in Government health committees behind locked doors.


The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at which such
controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted in the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and disturbing
lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from the text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release under the FOI section at the JCVI website (for example, JCVI CSM/DH (Committee on the Safety of Medicines/Department of Health) Joint Committee on Adverse Reactions Minutes 1986-1992.

In summary, the transcripts of the JCVI/DH meetings from the period from 1983 to 2010 appear to show that:

1) Instead of reacting appropriately by re-examining existing vaccination policies when safety concerns over specific vaccines were identified by their own investigations, the JCVI either a) took no action, b) skewed or selectively removed unfavourable safety data from public reports and c) made intensive efforts to reassure both the public and the authorities in the safety of respective vaccines;

2) Significantly restricted contraindication to vaccination criteria in order to increase vaccination rates despite outstanding and unresolved safety issues;

3) On multiple occasions requested from vaccine manufacturers to make specific amendments to their data sheets, when these were in conflict with JCVI’s official advices on immunisations;

4) Persistently relied on methodologically dubious studies, while dismissing independent research, to promote vaccine policies;

5) Persistently and categorically downplayed safety concerns while over-inflating vaccine benefits;

6) Promoted and elaborated a plan for introducing new vaccines of questionable efficacy and safety into the routine paediatric schedule, on the assumption that the licenses would eventually be granted;

7) Actively discouraged research on vaccine safety issues;

8) Deliberately took advantage of parents’ trust and lack of relevant knowledge on vaccinations in order to promote a scientifically unsupported immunisation program which could put certain children at risk of severe long-term neurological damage.

Dr. Tomlijenovic explains; for instance, how JCVI has known since as early as 1981 that the measles vaccine, which is part of the government’s official vaccine schedule, is linked to long-term neurological damage and death. She also outlines, with full citations, evidence showing that JCVI has long been aware that many of scheduled vaccines cause permanent brain damage in children, but have continued to promote those vaccines anyway.

Educated parents can either get their children out of harm’s way or continue living inside one of the largest most evil lies in history, that vaccines – full of heavy metals, viral diseases, mycoplasma, fecal material, DNA fragments from other species, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (a sterilizing agent) – are a miracle of modern medicine.

A Freedom of Information Act filing in the US with the CDC by a doctor with an autistic son, seeking information on what the CDC knows about the dangers of vaccines, had by law to be responded to in 20 days. Nearly 7 years later, the doctor went to court and the CDC argued it does not have to turn over documents. A judge ordered the CDC to turn over the documents on September 30th, 2011.

The US CDC is an unreliable source of information. They constantly grossly exaggerate death and disease figures to promote vaccines. The UK Department of Health does the same. Both for example have claimed flu causes thousands of deaths each year but in fact it does not. They do that to promote the flu vaccine, which the international Cochrane Collaboration, which publishes medical research into the accuracy of claims like that, has shown that the flu vaccine is not effective.

On October 26, 2011, a Denver Post editorial expressed shock that the Obama administration, after promising to be especially transparent, was proposing changes to the Freedom of Information Act that would allow it to go beyond declaring some documents secret and to actually allow government agencies (such as the CDC) to declare some document “non-existent.”

A short summary of the most important arguments that support NON-VACCINATION:

  • Vaccines contain a      combination of at least 39 different highly toxic metals, cancer      causing substances, toxic chemicals, live and genetically modified      viruses, bacteria, contaminated serum containing animal viruses and foreign      genetic material, extremely toxic de-contaminants and adjuvants, untested      antibiotics, none of which can be injected without causing any harm.      Vaccine contaminants have included bovine (cow), avian (chicken) and      monkey viruses and bacteria such as streptococcus in the DTP (diphtheria,      tetanus and pertussis) vaccine [Pediatrics, Vol. 75, No. 2, Feb 1985]      and Serratia marcesens in the influenza vaccines [2004 influenza season].
  • There is no      scientific study to determine whether vaccines have really prevented      diseases. Rather disease graphs show vaccines have been introduced      at the end of epidemics when the disease was already in its last      stages. In case of Small Pox the vaccine actually caused a great spurt in      the incidence of disease before public outcry led to its withdrawal.
  • There are no      long-term studies on vaccine safety. Very short-term tests are carried      out where the vaccinated subjects are checked against another group who      are given another vaccine. Technically the tests should be carried out      against a non-vaccinated group. No one really knows what protocols are      followed at such industry based or industry sponsored trials.
  • The mercury,      aluminum and live viruses in vaccines may be behind the huge epidemic of      autism (1 in 110 in the USA), a fact that has been admitted by the US      Vaccine Court. About 83 suspected cases of vaccines causing autism have      been awarded compensation.
  • Both the Small Pox and      the Oral Polio Vaccine are made from monkey serum. This serum has helped many      monkey viruses to enter the human blood stream. Out of these, the      only researched virus, SV 40, has been found to be cancerous. These      viruses continue to be in the vaccines. The presence of SV 40 in various      human cancers has been demonstrated. Today it is known that the virus is      being passed on to future generations as its presence in the mother’s milk      and human sperms has been established.
  • The number of polio      cases was declining before the widespread administration of the Salk      vaccine. Cases which had previously been reported as polio are now      reported as meningitis. The risk of contracting polio from the live virus      vaccine is greater than the risk of acquiring the disease from naturally      occurring viruses.
  • Many doctors argue      that diseases during childhood are due to the body exercising its immune      system. Suppressing these diseases causes the immune system to remain      undeveloped causing the various autoimmune disorders in adults like diabetes      and arthritis that have become epidemics today.
  • Vaccines suppress the      natural immunity and the body does not have natural antibodies anymore. The mother’s milk      therefore does not contain natural antibodies and can no longer protect      the child against illnesses.
  • In the USA vaccine      adverse effects are recorded and the Government offers compensation of millions      of dollars to victims (the most recent case in its Vaccine Court may have      received upto $200 million in damages). The courts in the USA have paid      nearly $ 2 billion in damages so far.
  • Vaccines try to create      humoral (blood related immunity) whereas it has been found that immunity      is developed at various levels: humoral, cellular, and organ specific.      We still do not know enough about the human immune system and therefore      should not interfere with it.
  • In addition to      childhood vaccination, new “hypes” like the Swine Flu, Bird Flu, Gardasil      for HPV virus and the annual flu vaccine are continuing the to damage      people’s health all throughout their life. Yves Thomas, the head of the National      Influenza Centre in Geneva said that, “The debate and the arguments      that surrounded the A(H1N1) influenza virus two years ago have sharpened      public mistrust toward the seasonal flu vaccine.” In 2010, the World      Health Organisation (WHO) was accused of dramatizing worldwide      influenza cases in order to result in much higher vaccine sales since many      countries had signed contracts with a stipulation to automatically buy      vaccines when the WHO gave the highest alert level.

A Few Questions To Ask Your Doctor

Don’t let yourself intimidated by medical doctors, they are NOT Gods and they surely are misinformed, many of them are corrupted or don’t want to acknowledge the dangers of vaccines. Most schools will offer you a waiver if you ask for one. There is NO law that can deny you that. Exemptions are typically for people who have compromised immune systems, allergies to the components used in vaccinations, or strongly held objections. All states but West Virginia and Mississippi allow religious exemptions, and twenty states allow parents to cite personal or philosophical objections. Get yourself educated on the matter, it’s about the life of your child!

ASK QUESTIONS like these:

1. What are the serious negative health effects that these vaccines can generate? Are the risks worth the benefits?

2. Dr. Michel Odent has linked asthma to the whooping cough vaccine. Have you read his research? What do you think?

3. Professor Wakefield (UK) has linked autism and Chrones disease to the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. What do you think? What evidence do you have to back up your opinions?

4. Why is the same dose of vaccines given to a two month old as for a 5 year old?

5. Are you aware that Japan changed the start time for vaccinating from 3 months to two years and straight away their SIDS rate plummeted?

6. Do you believe in herd immunity? If so, how is it that 98% of U.S.A. children are vaccinated yet they still have outbreaks of these diseases?

7. Most diseases were already 90% gone before any vaccines were introduced. If this is so, how can vaccines be applauded for diseases ceasing, especially when there were no vaccines for some diseases like bubonic plague and scarlet fever?

8. How can the Tetanus vaccine induce immunity, when contracting the disease naturally does not give immunity?

9. If the so-called diphtheria vaccine, which is in fact a toxoid, works against the toxin produced by the bacteria, and not against the bacteria itself, then how did this “vaccine” help in the decline in diphtheria?

To read and download the full 45 page report and its evidence by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD see the link below.

Read & Download Full Report.”

Knowledge is power.  Use the power wisely.

We are one

Fluoride, Art and a Blessing

I am stunned that people gladly buy bottled water without actually reading the contents.  This is because you “think” its plain water and you trust the manufacturer.  ALL bottled water, whether spring or prepared now contains FLUORIDE.

Fluoride has done nothing for dentistry as it is claimed by large firms who will push and promote that it does in fact do something!  They are consumer hungry and industry wishes to find a clever way to dispose of the fluoride toxic waste (which is what it actually is!)

If you are looking for a Fluoride free toothpaste, I can recommend ESI Aloe Fresh toothpaste which only has natural ingredients and can be bought at any Dischem.  Because it is imported it’s rather pricey but lasts up to three months per person as you only use a small pearl-size per brush.  I have personally been using this toothpaste for a year and have had absolutely no problems with my teeth – in fact my gums don’t bleed anymore!

Filters can be purchased at Makro, Dischem and even Pick ‘n Pay which either fit to your tap or a jug filtering system – however I recommend you check the details and be sure it removes fluoride also.

Please read the below carefully and consider your health and the health of your children when doing so.  Though this is copied directly from this website : http://www.fluoridealert.org/issues/health/  I also recommend you do your own research about this horrible crime.  Because that is what it is – a CRIME.  It also explains all the recent health issues!


“Fluoride & Health

Arthritis Gastrointestinal Effects
Bone Fracture Hypersensitivity
Brain Effects Kidney Disease
Cancer Male Fertility
Cardiovascular Disease Pineal Gland
Diabetes Skeletal Fluorosis
Endocrine Disruption Thyroid Disease
Acute Toxicity

introductory comments

Fluoride is a highly toxic substance. Consider, for example, the poison warning that the FDA now requires on all fluoride toothpastes sold in the U.S. or the tens of millions of people throughout China and India who now suffer serious crippling bone diseases from drinking water with elevated levels of fluoride.

In terms of acute toxicity (i.e., the dose that can cause immediate toxic consequences), fluoride is more toxic than lead, but slightly less toxic than arsenic. This is why fluoride has long been used in rodenticides and pesticides to kill pests like rats and insects. It is also why accidents involving over-ingestion of fluoridated dental products–including fluoride gels, fluoride supplements, and fluoridated water–can cause serious poisoning incidents, including death.

The debate today, however, is not about fluoride’s acute toxicity, but its chronic toxicity (i.e., the dose of fluoride that if regularly consumed over an extended period of time can cause adverse effects). The concerns with fluoride are primarily as follows:

  • Current safety standards only protect against the most obvious forms of harm: Current safety standards for fluoride are based on the premise that severe dental fluorosis and crippling skeletal fluorosis are the first adverse effects that fluoride can have on the body. These effects represent the crudest, most obvious tell-tale harm caused by fluoride. In the words of American University chemistry professor, Dr. William Hirzy, it would be a “biological miracle” if fluoride did not cause other harm prior to producing these end-stage forms of toxicity. Research already shows, in fact, that fluoride can cause arthritic symptoms and bone fracture well before the onset of crippling fluorosis, and can affect many other tissues besides bone and teeth, including the brain and thyroid gland.
  • The current “safe” daily dose for fluoride fails to withstand scrutiny: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) states that anyone over 8 years of age — irrespective of their health condition — can safely ingest 10 milligrams of fluoride each day for their entire life without developing symptomatic bone damage. Ten milligrams, however, is the same dose that the IOM concedes can cause clinical signs of skeletal fluorosis within just 1o to 20 years of exposure. On its face, a dose that causes clinical fluorosis in just 10 to 20 years can not be considered a safe lifetime dose, particularly since — contrary to IOM’s claim — clinical fluorosis is not asymptomatic, as it can not only cause chronic joint pain, but overt osteoarthritis as well. The IOM’s safety standard instills little confidence, therefore, in the medical understanding that currently underlies fluoride policies in the U.S.
  • Some people are particularly susceptible to fluoride toxicity: It is well known that individual susceptibility to fluoride varies greatly across the population, and yet, the National Research Council has recently found that breathtakingly large gaps still exist in the safety literature on the effects these populations may be experiencing as a result of current fluoride exposures. The bewildering degree of uncertainties identified by the NRC stands in stark contrast to the IOM’s conclusion that 10 mg/day is so definitively safe that no “uncertainty factor” needs to be applied to protect vulnerable members of the population.
  • The margin between the toxic and therapeutic dose is very narrow: The NRC concluded that the allegedly “safe” upper limit of fluoride in water (4 mg/l) is toxic to human health. While the NRC did not determine the safe level, their conclusion means that the safe level is less than 4 times the level added to water (0.7-1.2 mg/l) in community fluoridation programs. This is far too slim a margin to protect vulnerable members of the population, including those who consume high amounts of water.

Although fluoride advocates have claimed for years that the safety of fluoride in dentistry is exhaustively documented and “beyond debate,” the Chairman of NRC’s comprehensive fluoride review, Dr. John Doull, recently stated that: ”when we looked at the studies that have been done, we found that many of these questions are unsettled and we have much less information than we should, considering how long this [fluoridation] has been going on. I think that’s why fluoridation is still being challenged so many years after it began.”

In this section of the website, we provide overviews of the scientific and medical research that implicates fluoride exposure as a cause or contributor to various chronic health ailments. In 2001, the union of scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency’s Headquarters Office in Washington D.C. stated: “we hold that water fluoridation is an unreasonable risk.” The research in this section helps to demonstrate why EPA’s own scientists reached this conclusion, and why a growing number of health professionals do so as well. ”


Right, now that that is out of the way – I am going to be posting ORIGINAL ART by myself in early 2013, so watch this space!


And finally: